As Delhi is heading towards one more election in less than 15 months , people from all the parties and supporters are excited . Allegation from all the sides are in the air and social media is flooded with individual and public opinions . One of these opinion is for public debate between two faces of two major parties , BJP and AAP , Kiran Bedi and Arvind Kejriwal .
The idea seems not to be innovative , as it is already in place in USA , because of democratic structure of India . It is a suitable way of communicating your ideas to the people in the countries like USA or UK where 2 party rule and democracy exist .
If Narendra Modi will debate with Rahul Gandhi then surely Narendra Modi will win but it will be totally a wastage of time .
- This debate will be fruitful only when there will be AK and KB but its not possible as tens of other parties also contesting election
- Can we believe Kejriwal for putting proven facts as he never done any such act which has led to any result . Same can be said about Kiran Bedi as this is her debut in politics .
- India is not 2 party democracy hence Debate is totally absurd idea .
- Biggest question is about moderation . Indian Media can not be trusted which is all about TRP and Election Commission can not moderate as there is no such constitutional rule.
- Even if debate is done between 2 people , Other parties will cry foul and the public will be confused .
